Why France Will Have to Step Up on U.N. Peacekeeping Missions

Why France Will Have to Step Up on U.N. Peacekeeping Missions
A French soldier stands alongside troops who helped France take back Mali’s north as they participate in a ceremony formally transforming the force into a United Nations peacekeeping mission, Bamako, Mali, July 1, 2013 (AP photo by Harouna Traore).

There is a lot of talk at the United Nations about tailoring peace operations to address the specific needs of the countries and communities that they serve. But from the vantage of the Security Council, there are really only two types of peacekeeping missions: the ones the French like, and the ones the Americans and British like. The entire edifice of U.N. operations rests on a delicate network of bargains among Paris, London and Washington about how to balance these two groups of missions.

France has pushed for peacekeepers in a series of its former colonies including Cote d’Ivoire, Mali and the Central African Republic. For its part, the U.S. has relied on historical, humanitarian and political calculations to back large blue-helmet operations in Liberia, Darfur and South Sudan. The U.K. has also prioritized missions in its former colonial condominium of Sudan. These three permanent Security Council members have bartered long and hard in New York over how to divvy up troops and money among their preferred interventions.

When the British and Americans called for a mission to halt the conflict in Darfur in the mid-2000s, for example, France insisted that the U.N. should launch a parallel operation across the border in Chad. Paris and Washington have bickered for over a decade about the relative security requirements of Cote d’Ivoire and Liberia. The U.N. is finally winding up both of these West African deployments simultaneously. But the broader balance between French and Anglo-Saxon-backed missions is starting to look unsustainable.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review