The World’s Conflicts Didn’t Take a Pandemic Break

The World’s Conflicts Didn’t Take a Pandemic Break
A displaced Tigrayan child sits next to a COVID-19 isolation tent for internally displaced persons in Mekele, in the Tigray region of Ethiopia, May 5, 2021 (AP photo by Ben Curtis).

It is now three years since United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for an “immediate global ceasefire” in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 23, 2020, Guterres called on warring parties to “put armed conflict on lockdown” to allow health workers to fight the disease. Although always understood to be highly aspirational, the call created a rare glimmer of hope during the first months of the pandemic, as governments and armed groups in Colombia, the Philippines and elsewhere pledged to pause hostilities.

Today, the idea of a global cease-fire feels like a historical footnote from a very different time. The three years since Guterres made his proposal have been marked by a series of bloody conflicts. Most of the armed groups that initially expressed enthusiasm for the idea in March and April 2020 returned to hostilities within months. The Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in August 2021, Ethiopia’s civil war from December 2020 to late last year and Russia’s all-out assault on Ukraine since February 2022 have collectively claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, although the exact figures are difficult to ascertain.

This does not mean that Guterres’ initial call for a cease-fire was a bad idea. Back in March 2020, the impact of a global pandemic on international peace and war was uncertain. The day after Guterres made his appeal, the International Crisis Group released a special briefing that sketched out the possible political and security risks and trends that might accompany the pandemic. It seemed possible that COVID-19 would hit conflict-affected regions, such as northwest Syria, especially hard and exacerbate tensions in divided societies. It was also conceivable that it would shock some combatants into slowing or suspending hostilities.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review