U.S. Outreach to Iran, Cuba Still Lacks Broader Strategic Framework

U.S. Outreach to Iran, Cuba Still Lacks Broader Strategic Framework
U.S. President Barack Obama and Cuban President Raul Castro shake hands at the Summit of the Americas in Panama City, Panama, April 11, 2015 (AP photo by Pablo Martinez Monsivais).

One of the most salient criticisms of U.S. President Barack Obama’s recent overtures to Iran and Cuba is that neither country, as a condition for engagement, has agreed to undertake fundamental reforms of their internal political systems or alter the general direction of their foreign policies. Indeed, the leaders of both countries have claimed victory in defying those types of demands.

In theory, this need not be a setback. When Richard Nixon traveled to China in 1972, Mao Zedong did not repudiate his ideology, release any political prisoners or make any commitment to pursuing liberal political or economic reforms. Nixon, in essence, engaged a hard-line communist regime that made no secret of its dislike for the American system and continually criticized U.S. behavior. Moreover, Nixon’s visit upset many of America’s Asian allies, who feared it was the first sign of their own abandonment. The opening to China, however, was intended to help shift the global strategic balance back in favor of the U.S. and to help counterbalance the rising power of the Soviet Union, which threatened both Washington and Beijing. The engagement was less about promoting freedom for the Chinese people than about preserving it for Americans.

So could the United States learn to live with the Islamic Republic in Iran and the communist regime in Cuba even in their current, unreformed incarnations in exchange for longer-term strategic benefits? If there is indeed an emerging Russia-China entente that seeks to alter or even overturn key aspects of the post-Cold War settlement and to reduce the global leadership role of the U.S., then containing those two powers must become the central organizing principle of U.S. foreign policy. Under such an approach, the sins of both Iran and Cuba—serious as they may be when viewed in isolation—become less important in the global context. Similarly, U.S. outreach to Myanmar and Vietnam, both of which have poor human rights records, must be understood in relation to China.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.