Two weeks ago, in a startling move, President Donald Trump said he had ordered the Pentagon to begin plans for a military intervention in Nigeria. The ostensible mission was to protect Christian populations from alleged massacres and genocide at the hands of the jihadist militant group Boko Haram. “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump stated.
The day prior, at Trump’s behest, the State Department had labeled Nigeria a “country of particular concern” with regard to religious freedom, further framing the violence in Nigeria as a clash between Muslims and Christians. Yet this identity-based narrative is simplistic, even if the insurgent threat to Nigerians is real. Boko Haram has been terrorizing civilians in Nigeria’s northeast as well as in the neighboring countries of Niger and Chad since 2009, creating a festering humanitarian crisis around Lake Chad. Throughout its history, Boko Haram has used horrific methods of extortion, kidnapping, rape, torture and massacres to secure its territorial base and undermine stability in Nigeria.
But as WPR’s editor-at-large Judah Grunstein noted, Boko Haram mainly operates in Nigeria’s Muslim-majority northeast rather than the largely Christian south. Credible sources, such as the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data monitoring group, show that many of the group’s attacks—like Islamist extremists everywhere—actually target Muslim moderates, not Christians. The recent uptick in violence affecting churches rather than mosques is a small percentage of a widening problem of violence affecting Nigerian civilians of all religious groups.