The U.S. Should Fight for a Negotiated Settlement, Not Victory, in Afghanistan

The U.S. Should Fight for a Negotiated Settlement, Not Victory, in Afghanistan
A U.S. Army officer and Afghan National Army trainers, Kandahar, Afghanistan, Jan. 23, 2008 (U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 1st Class David M. Votroubek).

In a recent article for Defense One, national security expert Stephen Biddle argued that much of the debate on U.S. strategy in Afghanistan focuses on the wrong thing—the timetable for withdrawal—rather than on America’s ultimate strategic goals. The real objective, Biddle wrote, “is to end the war on terms Americans and Afghans can live with. But calendar deadlines and fixed withdrawal schedules make this almost impossible.” The only alternative to the collapse of the Afghan government and a likely victory by the Taliban, Biddle continued, is a negotiated settlement.

This conclusion is solidly grounded in the long, bloody history of insurgencies, particularly when foreign nations support the insurgents either overtly or by turning a blind eye to safe havens on their territory. Under these conditions, outright victory by one side or the other is nearly impossible.

This applies to Afghanistan today. There is no reason to believe that the Kabul government will ever muster the power and the will to militarily defeat the Taliban and eradicate its base of support inside Afghanistan. While a negotiated settlement that gives the Taliban a role in Afghanistan’s future is far from what Americans and most Afghans want, it may be the only feasible solution. The problem is getting to a settlement. That requires that all of the key participants—the Afghan government, the Taliban and Pakistan—conclude that continuing along the current path would be worse than a settlement.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review