The Realist Prism: U.S. Must Shift Onus of Proof on Iran’s Nuclear Program

The Realist Prism: U.S. Must Shift Onus of Proof on Iran’s Nuclear Program

As international negotiators prepare for the next round of talks with Iran over its nuclear program, scheduled in Moscow for June 18-19, the United States faces a 21st century version of a “Stevenson moment.” In 1962, in a forceful presentation backed by compelling photographic evidence at the United Nations, Ambassador Adlai Stevenson made the case that the Soviet Union was installing nuclear weapons in Cuba. In addressing Soviet Ambassador Valentin Zorin in the chamber of the Security Council, Stevenson pointedly declared, “Let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador. We do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear, and it is incontrovertible.”

When it comes to Iran, however, there is no equivalent of the clear and compelling evidence Stevenson was able to produce. Moreover, the credibility of the U.S. intelligence community is no longer sterling when it comes to such matters. In 2003, in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell was able to take a series of devious Iraqi actions that suggested deception and subterfuge and, with the addition of evidence that was later proven to be unreliable or even fabricated, build a case for an Iraqi weapons of mass destruction program. Yet after the subsequent invasion, the United States did not find the “retroactive evidence,” as Charles Krauthammer called it, that would have validated the prewar arguments. As a result, Washington has long found it more difficult to argue that Iran’s lack of compliance with the International Atomic Energy Agency combined with its failure to disclose all of its atomic assets is itself ipso facto proof that Tehran is actively developing nuclear weapons.

This is why Russian President Vladimir Putin’s statements to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Beijing are so interesting. Putin told Ahmadinejad, “We have always supported the right of the Iranian people to modern technologies, including the peaceful use of atomic energy. But I want to emphasize that it is peaceful we are talking about. You know our position.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review