The Realist Prism: Snowden Extradition Backlash Bodes Ill for Iran, Taliban Talks

The Realist Prism: Snowden Extradition Backlash Bodes Ill for Iran, Taliban Talks

In last week's column I raised the question of whether the United States can succeed in achieving its strategic objectives with regard to stability in Afghanistan and curtailing Iran's nuclear ambitions through negotiations with the Taliban and the new government of Iranian President Hasan Rouhani. But if the reaction of U.S. pundits to the Obama administration’s efforts to get accused NSA leaker Edward Snowden extradited are any indication, then the sort of protracted diplomatic efforts needed to resolve the Iran and Afghanistan crises are likely to run into considerable domestic political resistance.

American commentators on the left and the right are united in the perception that a refusal on the part of other countries to immediately comply with a U.S. request—in this case, to extradite Snowden—is an ipso facto admission of American defeat and a sign that negotiations don't work. Conservative pundits argue that the Obama team is ineffective because other countries do not fear or respect the United States—they see the president as weak and are confident they will pay no cost for defying Washington. Liberals are divided; for some in the Democratic foreign policy establishment, it is troubling that other countries do not seem to realize the difference between the "unilateralist” Republicans of the George W. Bush era and the Democrats whom they should now be more willing to accommodate. Others argue that Obama has been too willing to continue the policies of his predecessor—the “Barack W. Obama” phenomenon—and that only a clean break with Republican programs will allow other states to accept U.S. requests.

What all these approaches fail to recognize, however, is that successful U.S. diplomacy should not be measured solely by the extent to which an American diktat is accepted. The nature of any diplomatic effort is that the other party is free to say "no," whether it is threatened or asked nicely to toe the American line. The problem is that, when faced with a refusal, many come to the erroneous conclusion that the very act of engaging in diplomacy was a waste of time.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.