Not the Usual Suspects: No Easy Answers for EU Migrant Crisis

Not the Usual Suspects: No Easy Answers for EU Migrant Crisis
The tanker “Foscari” arrives in port carrying 562 immigrants, Naples, Italy, May 6, 2015 (Photo by Alessio Paduano/NurPhoto, Sipa via AP Images).

The recent spike in the numbers of migrants trying to reach Europe’s Mediterranean shores, accompanied by media images of fatal capsizings and other tragic scenes of human suffering, has reminded people of the moral as well as the humanitarian and political dimensions of the issue. This week, in response to months of urgent appeals, the European Union drafted recommendations for a quota system to distribute asylum-seekers and other migrants across the EU, to relieve some of the burden on the southern European states of Italy, Malta and Greece. But the debate over these migrants remains divisive and passionate.

World media and public opinion have found fault with European states that are struggling to cope with maritime humanitarian disasters and influxes of new migrants. The general tone of media coverage, as well as that of public intellectuals and opinion shapers, is that those who have risked so much to make a new life in Europe should be treated with generosity as their cases for asylum or immigration are adjudicated. The idea of instead returning them to their country of origin, or detaining them in poorly serviced facilities, is often portrayed as being inconsistent with the EU’s enlightened principles and its commitment to universal values of human rights and human dignity.

It is easy to demonize those who argue that there are limits to what Europe can offer these migrants. But a more textured analysis of the chain of responsibility for this terrible human drama is needed. European states also have obligations to their citizens, and several are still adjusting to a serious financial downturn that has led to reduced spending in many public services. Civil society and human rights organizations are placing pressure on European states and societies to increase maritime rescue operations, expand immigrant processing facilities and expedite resettlement. These demands are noble in purpose but need to be tempered by the simple realities of finite resources. Easing migrants’ transition to life in Europe might also encourage even larger numbers of migrants to attempt the journey, further overwhelming institutions in southern Europe, in a dynamic known as the pull factor.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.