Trump’s Trade Deals Can’t Fix What He Has Broken

Trump’s Trade Deals Can’t Fix What He Has Broken
Japanese Ambassador to the U.S. Shinsuke Sugiyama and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer applaud with President Donald Trump after signing a trade agreement at the White House, Washington, Oct. 7, 2019 (AP photo by Evan Vucci)

President Donald Trump can point to a handful of trade deals he has concluded since coming to office. What he cannot claim, though, is that he has made things better. New agreements with Canada, Mexico and Japan do not come close to offsetting the market access that was lost when Trump withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP. Americans also continue to pay higher tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars in imports from China, the European Union and a range other countries, while U.S. exporters are facing retaliatory tariffs in major markets.

A “phase one” agreement with China is reportedly close. Trump announced it last month from the Oval Office, calling it “the greatest and biggest deal ever,” though it still must be finalized and signed. But, like his other trade deals, it sounds like it will do little more than partially fix what Trump himself broke. As with the recent mini deal with Japan, getting something for states that voted for Trump, and for rural areas hurt by the trade war, appears to be the driving force behind this deal. Trump is boasting that China has agreed to buy $50 billion worth of soybeans, pork and other agricultural products, but China has not confirmed that figure, and many trade experts doubt it is feasible. Achieving that level of sales in a single year would require China to more than double the $20 billion in agricultural products that it imported in 2016, before the trade war began.

American farmers were doing just fine in China before the trade war. The costs inflicted on them and other American exporters and companies were supposedly justified by the goal of getting Beijing to agree to structural changes in its state-led economic model. Yet the rumored “concessions” by China to better protect intellectual property, liberalize foreign investment and open financial markets appear to be related to the implementation of laws China passed earlier this year, which the American business community regards as wholly inadequate. There are apparently no provisions to reduce subsidies for state-owned enterprises or to address other structural problems that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has been trying to negotiate for two years.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review