How Will Trump Deal With the Big-Three Threats to International Security?

How Will Trump Deal With the Big-Three Threats to International Security?
Then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump arrives at a campaign rally, Wilmington, Ohio, Nov. 4, 2016 (AP photo by John Minchillo).

When U.S. voters chose Donald Trump to be their president, they entrusted him among other things to handle what two months ago I characterized as the top three threats that currently require international cooperation: climate change, nuclear proliferation and terrorism. Expect the new president to sound a lot different on these issues than President Barack Obama. On terrorism and preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, the changes may be more rhetorical than real. On climate change, if the U.S. walks away from its leadership role, the consequences will be grave.

As a candidate, Trump expressed strong views on each of these topics, in ways that could weaken or even unravel achievements of the Obama presidency. It’s important to parse carefully where the new administration might be persuaded to pursue a more moderate course, and where ideology will prevail.

Over the course of his presidency, Obama came to the view that climate change was a major, if not the transcendent challenge for national and global security. He became a global leader, working with major powers and key emitters of greenhouse gases to build consensus on climate change objectives. At the 2009 climate change summit in Copenhagen, the president and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cajoled the Chinese into supporting international guidelines and agreements. In December 2015, the Paris agreement set new expectations for global compliance with vital climate change measures. That agreement came into force earlier this month, much faster than expected, when the required 55 states representing at least 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions ratified the deal. U.S. leadership was critical to the success of the process, and progress on climate change will be an important part of Obama’s legacy.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review