GOP’s Inconsistent Foreign Policy Appeal in Midterms Could Backfire

GOP’s Inconsistent Foreign Policy Appeal in Midterms Could Backfire
President Barack Obama arrives to vote early in the midterm elections, Oct. 20, 2014, Chicago, Ill. (AP photo by Evan Vucci).

Traditionally, U.S. midterm elections have been referenda on how a president has managed domestic affairs, a vote of confidence or rejection of his various policy choices. International events, however, can emerge as issues in the campaign to the extent that they indicate whether the country is moving in the right or the wrong direction.

In 2006, for instance, the Bush administration’s mismanagement of the Iraq War became a factor in the recapture of both houses of Congress by the Democrats because it was put forth alongside domestic disasters—such as the handling of Hurricane Katrina—as part of an effective campaign slogan that “Americans can do better.” Now the Republicans are seeking to return the favor, not only by maintaining their control of the House of Representatives but by becoming once again the majority party in the U.S. Senate. With control of both chambers of Congress, the GOP would be in a position to shape the policies and reach of the last two years of President Barack Obama’s term and could better position a Republican candidate to regain the White House in 2016.

Earlier this year, the conventional political wisdom was that problems with how the Affordable Care Act was rolled out, as well as a lackluster domestic economic recovery, would dominate the 2014 midterm campaign. To the extent that events over the past several months have improved the domestic situation, reducing the saliency of such appeals, it is not surprising to see increased discussion of Obama’s handling of foreign affairs finding its way into many of the House and Senate contests. A series of crises—the Ukraine faceoff with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the stunning rise and newfound reach of the so-called Islamic State (IS) in the Middle East and the specter of an Ebola epidemic finding its way into the American heartland—have revived security questions as voting issues.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review