Diplomatic Fallout: International Crisis Diplomacy on the Defensive, Part II

Diplomatic Fallout: International Crisis Diplomacy on the Defensive, Part II

When diplomats gathered at the United Nations last week to launch a series of commemorations of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, there was much talk of the need for decisive responses to early signs of future mass atrocities. By contrast, actual diplomacy to manage today’s well-advanced crises in Syria, South Sudan and the Central African Republic (CAR) was more tentative. The U.S. and Russia called for local cease-fires to ease the suffering in Syria. South Sudanese negotiatorsin Addis Ababa mulled a truce while fighting continued unabated at home. An agreement to appoint a new interim president in the CAR failed to curtail the country’s endemic violence.

Hardy optimists argue that the international community is still better at dealing with atrocities than it was two decades ago. Romeo Dallaire, the U.N. commander in Rwanda during the genocide, has praised the Security Council’s rapid authorization of additional peacekeepers to stem the fighting in South Sudan. Although the council remains divided over the Syrian war, even Russia and China pay lip service to the need to address the humanitarian consequences of the conflict. The chaos in CAR, which has unnerving echoes of Rwanda, has shaken previously uninterested powers, including the U.S., into trying to avert a genocide.

Yet in each case, the ostensible consensus in favor of international engagement has delivered underwhelming results. As I noted in last week’s column, leaders from Syria’s Bashar al-Assad to South Sudan’s Salva Kiir have ignored calls for restraint in pursuit of military gains. It is not surprising that politicians who can mobilize significant forces are prepared to use them. But there is a further problem. Western governments and international organizations have developed numerous tools to deter such violence since the Cold War. They are increasingly frustrated by the failure of these tools to work.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.