Despite Flaws, EU-Turkey Refugee Deal Pulls Europe Back From Brink

Despite Flaws, EU-Turkey Refugee Deal Pulls Europe Back From Brink
Afghan migrants during an anti-EU rally, Athens, Greece, March 19, 2016 (AP photo by Yorgos Karahalis).

The cynical deal struck between the European Union and Turkey aimed at stemming the flow of refugees into Europe is a sign of desperation. It is flawed on several levels, and is likely to do harm to Europe’s image as a champion of international norms and Western values. Ironically, it will also probably do more harm than good to any hopes Turkey may still harbor for EU membership. But for all its shortcomings, the deal is better than doing nothing, and its effective implementation will help restore Europe’s self-confidence and Turkey’s role as a regional problem-solver.

The deal finalized Friday in Brussels to help curtail the irregular migration from Syria via Turkey to the EU went into effect this week. There is a careful balance of commitments from the two sides: an even swap of refugees and migrants currently in Greece to be returned to Turkey, with Syrian refugees currently in Turkey being permitted into the EU through a more formal screening process. In addition, Turkey will work to prevent the emergence of new sea and land routes, in exchange for EU efforts to speed up 6 billion euros in aid earmarked for refugees already in Turkey, and to accelerate a visa-liberalization policy for Turks to travel to Europe. The deal was painfully negotiated over many months, with German Chancellor Angela Merkel playing the key role, at considerable political risk.

There are obvious reasons why this deal will be difficult, if not impossible, to implement. Human rights and legal experts question whether it is consistent with binding EU and international laws and treaties; court action could delay some of its provisions. As a practical matter, staffing the necessary bureaucracy to carefully consider individual cases and determine who will be sent back from Greece, and who in Turkey will be accepted for asylum in Europe, is a daunting challenge. As with United Nations peacekeeping, the recruiting, vetting and deploying of hundreds of trained staff to difficult assignments cannot be done quickly. And the refugees and migrants themselves are independent actors, who may find new ways to thwart the deal in practice.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review