War is Boring: For Future Conflicts, U.S. Military Thinks Small

War is Boring: For Future Conflicts, U.S. Military Thinks Small

During the Cold War, U.S. military forces operated in big, firepower-heavy formations, designed to fight equally big and powerful Soviet formations -- or what the Pentagon calls "peer" opponents.

Times have changed, but the military hadn't -- until now. In recent months, reformers have successfully fought for sweeping changes to military force structure. The changes are meant to boost the Pentagon's ability to fight in low-intensity, "persistent" conflicts, as opposed to the short, high-intensity major conflicts expected in the recent past.

In addition to the structural changes, persistent conflicts demand new ways of thinking about -- and training for -- war, experts say.

Keep reading for free.

Register below for instant access to the rest of this article (no credit card required). You'll also get our free newsletters and two pieces of expert analysis each month. Simply click one of the icons below to instantly login with a social account, or use your email address:
Or skip to premium access for just $12 for the first 12 weeks.
After 12 weeks you'll be charged $77 annually.