As Israel contemplates military action to retard the development of Iran’s nuclear program, U.S. and Arab policymakers are trying to determine the second- and third-order effects that such a strike would have on the region. A recent exercise by U.S. Central Command has raised concerns among U.S. policymakers that an Israeli strike on Iran would do serious damage to U.S. interests in the region in particular, but analysts must remain humble about what we can really know with certainty about such contingencies. Both Iranian and Israeli intentions are unclear, and the United States and its allies have remarkably poor political intelligence on both countries. And as we Americans have learned in Iraq and Afghanistan, once the shooting starts, it is always difficult to determine how it will end. Friction and the fog of war conspire to frustrate even the most clear-eyed commanders and analysts.
Keeping in mind that spirit of humility, it is worth examining the question of how Hezbollah, assessed to be an Iranian proxy group in Lebanon, might react to an Israeli strike on Iran. The assumption that Hezbollah would respond to such a strike by attacking Israel remains a good one, but it deserves more scrutiny than it normally gets. ...
To read the rest, sign up to try World Politics Review
Sign up for two weeks of free access with your credit card. Cancel any time during the free trial and you will be charged nothing.
Request a free trial for your office or school. Everyone at a given site can get access through our institutional subscriptions.
- Strategic Horizons: Obama’s Islamic State Strategy Avoids Failure—but Also Success
- Yemen’s Women Fight to Protect Uprising’s Gains Amid New Turmoil
- Russia Becomes the Middle East’s Preferred but Flawed Nuclear Partner
- Diplomatic Fallout: U.N. Serves as Perfect Alibi for Big Power Inaction in Unfixable Crises
- Qatar Ties Reflect India’s Middle East Balancing Act