U.S., China, Russia Play Power Politics in Space

U.S., China, Russia Play Power Politics in Space

The Bush administration recently published an unclassified version of its new National Space Policy. Like the 2005 National Defense Strategy and the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review, the new policy stresses the vital interest of the United States in remaining a major space power. Although it acknowledges the value of international cooperation in space and the right of "free passage" for all countries' satellites and other space-based objects, the policy reaffirms the intent to protect U.S. space capabilities by all available means.

The new policy will likely intensify Chinese and Russian fears that the United States intends to deploy weapons in space such as interceptor missiles, orbiting lasers, and massive metal rods that could rain down upon earth-based targets (nicknamed "metallurgical nukes" by Chinese defense analysts and "rods from god" by their more religious American colleagues). In particular, Chinese and Russian officials have expressed alarm that the United States want to acquire the means to orchestrate attacks in space against Chinese and Russian reconnaissance satellites and long-range ballistic missiles, whose trajectory takes them through the lower atmosphere. For several years, the Chinese and Russian delegations to various U.N. disarmament meetings have jointly proposed opening negotiations on preventing the militarization of space. Although the Bush administration has consistently denied accusations that it plans to deploy offensive weapons in space, U.S. representatives cast the sole vote against such U.N. proposals in October 2005 and November 2006. Department of Defense budget documents indicate that the Pentagon expects to spend $500 million in fiscal year 2008 for a Space Test Bed to conduct research on space-based ballistic missile defenses.

In response, the Chinese and Russian governments have issued broad threats intended to dissuade the United States from actually deploying -- as opposed to researching -- weapons in space. For example, in 2005 China's U.N. ambassador warned that China might reconsider its arms control and nonproliferation policies if the United States militarized space. That same year, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov threatened retaliation against any country that deployed spaced-based weapons. After the new U.S. space policy became public, Vladimir Popovkin, the commander of Russian Space Forces, said Russia "must be ready to take adequate offensive and defensive measures" if other countries were to develop and deploy space-based weapons.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review