Trump’s Restrictions on Central Americans Seeking Asylum Could Destabilize the Region

Trump’s Restrictions on Central Americans Seeking Asylum Could Destabilize the Region
Nicole Castillo, 7, of East Boston, holds a sign while standing with her brother Diego, 4, and mother Elsa, who is originally from El Salvador, during a “Here to Stay” rally, Boston, July 6, 2017 (AP photo by Charles Krupa).

On Oct. 12, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions claimed that America’s asylum process was “subject to rampant abuse and fraud,” that migrants were taking advantage of the system and that “genuinely meritorious” asylum claims were down. He offered no evidence for these sweeping statements beyond the fact that asylum petitions had increased in recent years and his claim that “many”—he didn’t say how many—asylum-seekers who pass “credible fear” interviews, the initial screening process for those seeking asylum at the U.S. border, then “simply disappear and never show up at their immigration hearings” once they are in the country. Sessions’ comments reflected attempts by the Trump administration to link the asylum process with hard-line immigration reform, both of which have serious consequences for Central Americans.

Sessions’ comments followed the Trump administration’s announcement in September that it was ending the program, initiated by the Obama administration in 2014, that allowed minors who were trying to escape violence in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras and who had parents legally living in the United States to apply for asylum from their home countries. Although the program was later expanded to include other qualifying nonminor family members, its goal was to provide a safe path to reunite Central American children with their parents, rather than see them attempt a dangerous journey north on foot.

Under the Central American Minors Program, minors already in the U.S. who were denied refugee status were automatically eligible to apply for parole, a status that would allow them to stay and work in the U.S. as long as the program existed. Like the refugee program itself, the parole provision required extensive screening, including mandatory DNA testing, to determine eligibility. Shortly after Donald Trump’s inauguration, though, it was suspended pending review. In August, the parole provision was rescinded as the Department of Homeland Security cited “a new strategy to secure the U.S. southern border.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review