Trump’s Attacks on the WHO Over the Coronavirus Are a Gift to China

Trump’s Attacks on the WHO Over the Coronavirus Are a Gift to China
President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence at a White House press briefing on the coronavirus pandemic, Washington, April 20, 2020 (AP photo by Alex Brandon).

As a teenager, I watched in confusion as my father, a successful chest surgeon who specialized in infant care, went back to school to gain an advanced degree in public health. This required easing himself out of a job that had always impressed me with its heroics, often literally saving a life or two each week. When my father patiently explained the rationale, I gradually came to not only accept it but admire it, for its logic and even nobility. No matter how hard he worked, in the operating room he could only help a few people each week. But in public health, he could contribute to improving the lives of large numbers of people for years and years.

In the early 1980s, my father took his new skills to West Africa, where he ran a regional program under the aegis of the World Health Organization that focused on improving primary health care delivery in 20 countries. It meant promoting measures that could prevent the spread of common diseases and building up local capacity to respond to basic health problems, including a focus on the training of many local doctors and nurses, who could sustain these capacities on their own and help them spread throughout the countryside.

The biggest funder for these activities was the United States Agency for International Development, a body that was established under President John F. Kennedy. But a lot had changed during the two decades since the Kennedy administration. My memories are still filled with recollections of dinner table conversation in which my father vented about Washington’s reluctance to commit American resources to initiatives like those of the World Health Organization, especially ones that didn’t create a physical monument that one could plant an American flag on, or didn’t guarantee supportive votes from the beneficiary countries at the United Nations.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review