go to top
Chemical weapons being transported out of Syria on a Danish cargo ship, May 13, 2014 (AP photo by Petros Karadjias).

Despite 2013 Deal, Chemical Weapons Are Now Routine in Syria’s War

Friday, Dec. 4, 2015

In August, in a village called Marea, north of Aleppo, a mortar loaded with mustard gas and allegedly fired by militants from the self-declared Islamic State landed on a house. The chemical weapons badly burned three family members inside and killed an infant. Months earlier, between March and May, helicopters from Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime dropped barrel bombs on the rebel-held province of Idlib. Unlike the usual rudimentary explosives favored by Assad’s forces, these barrels were loaded with toxic chemicals, most likely chlorine. At least six people were killed, including three children from the same family.

The details of these chemical weapons attacks come from a fact-finding mission to Syria by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) earlier this year. The OPCW is the international body that Syria joined in 2013, as part of a Russia-negotiated maneuver to avert U.S. airstrikes after the Syrian regime’s deadly chemical attacks on the rebel-held Ghouta suburbs of Damascus, in which some 1,400 civilians were killed. In the aftermath, Syria declared and surrendered its arsenal of 1,300 tons of chemical weapons, ostensibly allowing U.S. President Barack Obama to save face for not enforcing his own “red line” on Assad’s use of chemical weapons. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.