The Realist Prism: Knowing When to Walk Away from Afghanistan

The Realist Prism: Knowing When to Walk Away from Afghanistan

Are the deck chairs being reshuffled on the Titanic that is the Afghan war? First, Afghan President Hamid Karzai forced the resignations of his interior minister, Hanif Atmar, and the head of his intelligence services, Amrullah Saleh. Next, the U.K. special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Sherard Cowper-Coles, went on indefinite leave, turning over his post to his deputy. Now, in the aftermath of the infamous Rolling Stone profile, U.S. President Barack Obama has removed Gen. Stanley McChrystal as commander of U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan, replacing him with Gen. David Petraeus.

What is interesting to note, of course, is that each of these men left or was forced out from his post for holding quite different views about the way forward in Afghanistan. Atmar and Saleh have opposed Karzai's "plan B" of reaching out to the Taliban through negotiations to try and bring them into a government of national unity. They were also among the most pro-American members of his cabinet. So perhaps Karzai was worried by the Soviet-era precedent of Moscow replacing ineffective Afghan communist leader Babrak Karmal with his intelligence chief Najibullah back in 1986, and wanted to forestall a replay of this scenario in 2010.

Cowper-Coles, Britain's counterpart to America's Richard Holbrooke, was an opponent of the U.S.-proposed "surge" in Afghanistan, arguing that there would be no military solution and that Karzai's strategy of negotiations was the only way forward to extricate the West from the apparent quagmire it faces in the mountains of the Hindu Kush. His strongly advocated position -- reiterated in a recent speech in London -- was creating a wave of cognitive dissonance within the ranks of the U.S.-NATO mission, putting him at odds with the rest of the team.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article as well as three free articles per month. You'll also receive our free email newsletter to stay up to date on all our coverage:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having your own personal researcher and analyst for news and events around the globe. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of 15,000+ articles
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday
  • Weekly in-depth reports on important issues and countries
  • Daily links to must-read news, analysis, and opinion from top sources around the globe, curated by our keen-eyed team of editors
  • Your choice of weekly region-specific newsletters, delivered to your inbox.
  • Smartphone- and tablet-friendly website.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review