The Middle East: Now a Three-State Solution?

The Middle East: Now a Three-State Solution?

Now what? Is this anyone's idea of how things would turn out in the yet-to-be-born Palestinian state? After three days of a vicious civil war in the Gaza strip, the Islamic militants of Hamas routed their rivals of the more secular Fatah. In the process, they killed scores of Palestinians. They terrorized their own people, and they made a questionable future even more uncertain. When Hamas gunmen took over the Gaza headquarters of Fatah and emptied file cabinets into the street, what came flying out the window were the best laid plans of politicians and pundits for a future Palestinian state.
<<ad>>
The much-touted two-state solution -- one Israel and one Palestine, living side by side in peace -- now looks like a relic of simpler times. Now we seem to have a two-state dissolution: two Palestinian entities, Gaza and the West Bank, each ruled by different governments with sharply different ideologies. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says he has dissolved the Hamas-led government. Hamas rejects the decision, but the two sides' differences will not easily disappear. So now what? A three-state solution?

If elections came today, Hamas would probably not fare as well as it did in January 2006, when it emerged as the leading party in the Palestinian Parliament. By killing peaceful demonstrators, throwing enemies from rooftops, shooting off kneecaps, firing inside hospitals, the supposedly devout Muslims of Hamas showed a side that will surely lose them some votes. On the other hand, Fatah, hardly clean, again looked incompetent and ineffectual. After all, it lost Gaza.

The carnage between the two sides should not have come as a surprise. The ingredients for the recipe only needed a little stirring. Hamas wants an Islamic state, and it has steadfastly rejected Israel's right to exist. Fatah, on the other hand, always adhered to a more secular vision and its leadership gradually and reluctantly agreed to recognize Israel and negotiate peace. The competing ideologies left little room for compromise. Pour in Gaza's explosive birth rate, a radical theology that justifies resolving disagreements at the point of a gun or with a suicide belt, then add massive smuggling of weapons across the border with Egypt. The pot had to explode.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review