Responsible for Verifying Iran Nuclear Deal, IAEA Lacks Reliable Support

Responsible for Verifying Iran Nuclear Deal, IAEA Lacks Reliable Support

Last week’s special session of the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), convened primarily to secure emergency funding for enhanced safeguards activities in Iran, provided an acute reminder of both the IAEA’s importance and its precarious financial situation. The international community demands ongoing high performance from the agency, while chronically failing to replenish resources perilously close to exhaustion. And yet, given the agency’s central role in key nuclear nonproliferation and security efforts, the stakes could not be higher.

The IAEA is integral to international efforts as diverse as implementing the interim nuclear deal—and any potential follow-on comprehensive agreement—with Iran, responding to assistance requests following nuclear accidents such as Fukushima and preventing nuclear materials from falling into the hands of terrorists. In the 1990s, the agency used safeguards techniques to detect the fact that North Korea had made false declarations concerning its weapons-useable plutonium inventory. Following South Africa’s admission that it had covertly developed nuclear weapons, the agency verified that country’s full nuclear disarmament. And while the IAEA has sometimes struggled to detect covert nuclear activities—most prominently in Iraq, Syria and Iran—it has played a pivotal role in efforts to resolve nonproliferation compliance challenges in these and other cases. From the perspectives of Iran and the P5+1—the negotiating group composed of the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany—only the IAEA has both the independence and technical expertise to credibly verify nuclear agreements between the parties.

In November, after nearly a decade of diplomatic stalemate, the P5+1 and Iran finally negotiated an interim accord that will limit key dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The agency will be vital to verifying Iran’s compliance with the accord, and thus facilitating ongoing negotiation of a comprehensive agreement. Verification will primarily require the IAEA to intensify its regular safeguards activities in Iran. Inspectors will, for example, enjoy daily access to the Natanz and Fordow enrichment facilities, rather than waiting weeks between inspections. Some provisions of the deal are novel, however, including a provision for “managed access” to certain facilities that will enable the agency to ensure that Iran complies with a freeze on new centrifuge production.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.