What Would a U.S. Grand Strategy of Restraint Look Like?
In his 2014 book “Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy,” Barry Posen argued that America’s post-Cold War grand strategy of global engagement is costly, unsustainable and unnecessary. U.S. national security interests could be secured, he argued, with a leaner and more effective national security strategy that places more of an emphasis on air and sea power rather than the permanent stationing of U.S. troops overseas.
In this week’s podcast interview, Posen, who is currently the Ford International Professor of Political Science at MIT and the Director of the MIT Security Studies Program, joins WPR’s associate editor, Elliot Waldman, for a conversation about how the ideas he advanced in his book might look when put into practice. They also discuss the Trump administration’s foreign policy and why Posen believes Trump’s grand strategy can be called “illiberal hegemony.”
If you like what you hear on Trend Lines and what you’ve read on WPR, you can sign up for our free newsletter to get our uncompromising analysis delivered straight to your inbox. The newsletter offers a free preview article every day of the week, plus three more complimentary articles in our weekly roundup every Friday. Sign up here. Then subscribe.
Subscribe: iTunes | RSS | Spotify
Relevant Articles on WPR:
Trump Has Opened the Floodgates to New Appraisals of U.S. Foreign Policy
America’s Quest for an Open World: A Grand Strategy Grounded in History
Obama Was on the Right Track Recalibrating America’s Role in the World
Was the Liberal International Order All That?
Trend Lines is produced and edited by Peter Dörrie, a freelance journalist and analyst focusing on security and resource politics in Africa. You can follow him on Twitter at @peterdoerrie.
To send feedback or questions, email us at email@example.com.