North Korea’s Provocations Revive U.S. Missile Shield in South Korea

North Korea’s Provocations Revive U.S. Missile Shield in South Korea
A man watches a TV news program showing footage of a North Korean missile launch, Seoul, South Korea, March 3, 2016 (AP photo by Ahn Young-joon).

North Korea’s recent provocations—a nuclear test in January and a missile test, under the guise of a peaceful satellite launch, a month later—have pressed the United States, along with its key regional allies, South Korea and Japan, into recalibrating Washington’s failed policy of so-called strategic patience with Pyongyang. Concerns about North Korea’s aggressive behavior coupled with ineffective responses thus far have prompted Washington, Seoul and Tokyo to stress that there can be no more maintenance of the status-quo when it comes to deterrence.

In addition to seeking new and more-robust sanctions at the United Nations Security Council, one of the most talked-about options for tightening the screws on the North is the potential deployment of the U.S. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) advanced anti-missile shield to South Korea. Proponents of the THAAD system argue that the current anti-missile capacity from South Korean and U.S. forces in the region is insufficient to meet the evolving challenges posed by the North’s arsenal of short- and medium-range missiles. Currently, the U.S. forces in South Korea are limited to Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC) batteries, which only target missiles during their final descent and lack THAAD’s ability to intercept missiles at a higher altitude. Critics of THAAD’s potential impact note that, despite its enhanced capabilities, it would likely be unable to fend off a massive attack from the North, which has the ability to deploy 1,000 short- and medium-range missiles simultaneously.

After the latest round of provocations from Pyongyang, the U.S. and South Korea agreed last month to commence consultations on deploying THAAD to protect Seoul against these missile threats. Then, last Friday, long-delayed talks finally started in Seoul. The THAAD deployment has been debated for years now and has been routinely raised after North Korean provocations. Aside from concerns about THAAD’s operational effectiveness, there are also key geostrategic concerns in the region.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article as well as three free articles per month. You'll also receive our free email newsletter to stay up to date on all our coverage:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having your own personal researcher and analyst for news and events around the globe. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of 15,000+ articles
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday
  • Weekly in-depth reports on important issues and countries
  • Daily links to must-read news, analysis, and opinion from top sources around the globe, curated by our keen-eyed team of editors
  • Your choice of weekly region-specific newsletters, delivered to your inbox.
  • Smartphone- and tablet-friendly website.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review