‘Make in India’: Can Modi Reboot India’s Cities?

‘Make in India’: Can Modi Reboot India’s Cities?
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the inaugural ceremony of 'Make in India' week, Mumbai, India, Feb. 13, 2016 (AP photo by Rajanish Kakade).

For more than six decades following India’s independence in 1947, urbanization remained an afterthought for policymakers, who hardly recognized the positive relationship between urban expansion and economic development. It wasn’t until 1984, when Rajiv Gandhi became India’s youngest prime minister and brought with him a new, young brigade of leaders, that those in power began to acknowledge that urbanization could serve India’s economy. Gandhi’s initiatives on urbanization, while new, were nonetheless hesitant.

Through the 1990s and the early 2000s, analysts increasingly spoke of India’s “urban turn” and hinted at the beginnings of a serious investment in urban infrastructure and connectivity. But in practice, the government remained reluctant to enact policies that would support an urban future. That changed in May 2014, when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was elected. Within months, new Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the Make in India initiative, encouraging multinational and domestic companies to manufacture products in India, signaling a major policy shift toward industrialization and urbanization.

However, it remains to be seen whether the BJP’s new approach is achievable, and what its likely consequences will be if it is implemented. These questions are important, but the answers are not obvious, as the Make in India initiative is constrained by two historical features of India’s economic development: low and slow urbanization and a small industrial sector. Official figures indicate that only 31 percent of India’s total population is urban. Moreover, the rate of urban expansion is slow—urban growth in India is lower than in almost all other developing regions, and below what its own urbanization rate was during the much-maligned slow-growth period from the 1960s through the 1980s. Some of the poorest regions in the eastern and northern parts of the country have barely urbanized. Furthermore, existing urban areas are often inhospitable to migrants, with high levels of poverty.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review