Lifting U.S. Sanctions on a Russian Aluminum Giant Is Not a Gift to the Kremlin

Lifting U.S. Sanctions on a Russian Aluminum Giant Is Not a Gift to the Kremlin
Oleg Deripaska, the founder of Rusal, attends a meeting of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian business leaders, Moscow, Dec. 19, 2016 (Photo by Alexei Druzhinin for Sputnik via AP Images).

While the Trump administration follows through with reimposing sanctions on Tehran after it withdrew the U.S. from the Iran nuclear agreement, the rhetoric over American sanctions on Russia is seriously overheating. Debate centers on the Treasury Department’s potential removal of the Russian aluminum firm Rusal from its blacklist of sanctioned Russian entities. This dispute risks obscuring how a desire to hit back against Russia over its election interference, rather than punish Rusal’s oligarch founder, Oleg Deripaska, invites severe unintended consequences. While the political value of keeping Rusal on the Treasury blacklist may seem high, it comes with wider economic costs that are being overlooked.

The controversy began when Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin indicated publicly that the Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, may remove Rusal from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, known as the SDN list. OFAC sanctioned Rusal back in April because Deripaska’s holding company, En+ Group, controlled a significant percentage of Rusal shares. In its press release announcing the initial designation, the Treasury Department linked Deripaska directly to the Kremlin, citing an array of illegal activity on behalf of the interests of the Russian Federation. Since then, the Treasury Department has repeatedly extended the deadline for companies to unwind their business with Rusal and a handful of other sanctioned Russian firms, while publicly stating that it was negotiating how to legally allow them to continue operations without Deripaska’s involvement.

Many observers who have been critical of President Donald Trump’s passive attitude toward the threat of Russian interference into U.S. elections were quick to pounce at Mnuchin’s announcement. Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal tweeted that, in taking this position, the Treasury Department was privileging Russian jobs over the safety of Americans. Bill Browder, the Anglo-American businessman whose lawyer was found dead in a Russian prison after uncovering and alleging tax fraud, and who has since led the charge to go after the Kremlin’s inner circle, also criticized the news. He wrote on Twitter that it was “hard to understand what logic there could be to take this action given Putin’s malevolence.” An op-ed in The New York Times called it “Another Gift for a Putin Buddy.”

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.