It’s Time for the U.S. to Rethink Its Approach to Crisis Management and Deterrence

It’s Time for the U.S. to Rethink Its Approach to Crisis Management and Deterrence
President Donald Trump reviews the troops during a full honors welcoming ceremony for Secretary of Defense Mark Esper at the Pentagon, in Washington, July 25, 2019 (AP photo by Alex Brandon).

Depending on which headlines you scanned over your morning coffee last week, World War III seemed to be on the verge of breaking out, either in the skies over the Sea of Japan or on the water in the Strait of Hormuz. Luckily, neither the South Korean air force’s muscular interception of a joint Russian-Chinese air patrol—including the firing of flares and warning shots—nor Iran’s seizure of a British oil tanker triggered the next conflagration. Still, all the sensational spin about end-time tripwires is a clear indicator of how a doomsday mindset is clouding our thinking about today’s multipolar world.

Some pundits debate whether or not the world is now in a new “G-Zero” era of increased conflict with few winners and no leaders. Others have made a parlor game out of guessing whether Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping will be first to escalate diplomatic and trade standoffs with the U.S. into a shooting war. Most seem to acknowledge that we have entered the “Second Nuclear Age,” in which the spread of nuclear weapons and cyber capabilities, combined with reassessments of Cold War-era strategic assumptions, has accelerated changes in the character of war, with alarming implications for deterrence. But agreement about the scope of the problem hasn’t led to consensus over how to update the way we think about what wonks call “crisis stability”—dynamics that allow for security standoffs to be deescalated without resort to all-out war.

The near-daily frisson of handwringing over proliferating security dilemmas suggests something is off lately in our reading of the geopolitical tea leaves. It’s not so much that we don’t know where the fault lines lie. Whether India versus Pakistan, Israel versus Iran, or the U.S. versus North Korea, China and Russia, there are a range of scenarios for potential escalation that we tend to take for granted.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review