Global Insights: NATO’s Modest Chicago Summit

Global Insights: NATO’s Modest Chicago Summit

This week’s NATO Summit in Chicago, attended by the heads of state and government of alliance member states as well as senior representatives of various NATO partner countries and organizations, was less ambitious than some recent summits. With regard to the alliance itself, the summit announced no new members, or even a timetable for the four aspirant countries, and raised no funds for collective missions, as in Afghanistan. That said, the summit did perform the important function of reaffirming that despite their economic problems, member countries have been fulfilling all the vague commitments they made at the November 2010 Lisbon Summit, where the alliance adopted a new Strategic Concept. More generally, the summit also allowed the allies to renew their mutual solidarity amid all the recent talk of the U.S. pivot to Asia.

The issue that drew the most attention in Chicago was how long NATO would continue its large-scale combat efforts in Afghanistan. The summit reaffirmed the timetables adopted at the Lisbon Summit while adding some new milestones. NATO members and coalition partners in the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) also pledged in principle to continue some kind of military presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014, though with a different name and mission.

With regard to Afghanistan, NATO leaders and their partners must balance the conflicting demands of their domestic and international audiences. The alliance must communicate to the Taliban and other Afghans, as well as to their neighbors in Pakistan, that NATO will stay in Afghanistan as long as necessary to secure a just and enduring Afghan peace agreement. But alliance leaders must make their domestic publics believe that coalition forces will leave Afghanistan as soon as possible, while reducing their commitments rapidly until then. In the past, NATO leaders have finessed the troop withdrawal issue by allowing Canada and other countries to announce that they have removed all their combat troops from Afghanistan, while keeping almost as many troops in the country in non-combat roles, such as training and advising the Afghan Security Forces. This seems to be the approach adopted with regard to newly elected French President François Hollande’s pledge to withdraw French troops by the end of 2012.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.