Even After Midterms, Obama Faces Hard Choices on Energy, Climate

Even After Midterms, Obama Faces Hard Choices on Energy, Climate
U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping hold a press conference at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, Nov. 12, 2014 (Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy).

Whenever a U.S. president’s party experiences major losses during a midterm congressional election, there is always pressure to fire members of his team. In this particular cycle, pundits have urged President Barack Obama to consider replacing his national security adviser, Susan Rice, and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, among others, as part of an effort to change course and find a new direction for his last two years in office. But staffing questions do not lie at the heart of the Obama administration’s problems. Rather, the administration has fallen short in its ability to define U.S. strategic priorities and to push through the policies needed to implement them.

Take the recent rapid and noticeable decline in global energy prices. Saudi Arabia, instead of cutting back on production in order to absorb the current glut of oil on the market, has sustained its production, apparently at the request of the United States. This amounts to a stealth attack on the energy revenues of states like Russia, Iran and Venezuela, which face severe strains on their budgets if the current price dip becomes a long-term trend. Certainly, U.S. consumers also benefit from lower gasoline bills and the savings on the prices of consumer goods that results from lower energy costs.

Yet the short-term benefits from lower energy prices mask a longer-term strategic conundrum. For the past several years, high energy prices have made the cost of developing and exploiting North America’s massive reserves of unconventional hydrocarbons worth bearing. In turn, the growth of America’s indigenous energy industries has been an important component of an otherwise lackluster economic recovery. The Saudis may be happy to drive world prices lower, particularly as a way to punish the Russians for their continued support for the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and their assistance to Riyadh’s regional rival Iran. But they are also aware that sustained low prices will be the death knell of much of the new energy being produced in the U.S.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review