Demystifying Trump’s Confounding Statements About Nuclear Weapons

Demystifying Trump’s Confounding Statements About Nuclear Weapons
An ICBM launch control facility in the countryside outside Minot, North Dakota, June 24, 2014 (AP photo by Charlie Riedel).

The surprising election of Donald Trump as president of the United States has created countless new questions and concerns about the future of U.S. foreign policy. But perhaps nowhere are these concerns more acute than in Trump’s thoughts about nuclear weapons. While often inchoate and contradictory, Trump’s recent comments about strengthening and expanding U.S. nuclear capabilities, apparently welcoming an arms race with Russia, and possibly encouraging allies to develop their own nuclear deterrent have all caused great concern among defense analysts and foreign policy professionals, not to mention many within the U.S. government. Given the enormous stakes involved, it is worth demystifying some of what Trump has said and putting this nuclear debate in context.

First, nuclear modernization was happening anyway. The upgrading of the U.S. nuclear arsenal—and for that matter, Russia’s as well—has already begun. Earlier this year, the Obama administration committed to a $1 trillion overhaul over the next three decades, covering everything from a new stealth bomber to the Department of Energy’s massive research and development program.

Trump was right, but hardly alone, to suggest that some parts of the U.S. nuclear force are aging, but plans have been in place for over half a decade to modernize all three legs of the nuclear triad—submarines, land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and strategic bombers—as well as the broader U.S. nuclear infrastructure. A considerable amount of money has already been spent to this end, and replacement nuclear systems are likely to come on line in the next decade or so. These new systems, which will be far more sophisticated than those deployed or being developed by other countries, will keep the U.S. in the nuclear game well into the second half of this century.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.