As a U.S.-China Trade War Looms, Are Trump and His Trade Hawks Winning?

As a U.S.-China Trade War Looms, Are Trump and His Trade Hawks Winning?
Location manager Lee Erwin unloads corn from a trailer at the Heartland Co-op in Redfield, Iowa, April 5, 2018 (AP photo by Charlie Neibergall).

After a relatively quiet first year in the White House, President Donald Trump is delivering on his campaign promises to get tough on trade, especially with China. In 2017, the Trump administration launched a number of investigations into foreign trade practices but took little action beyond abandoning the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which the Obama administration had negotiated with 11 Pacific Rim countries. Trump also threatened to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement if Canada and Mexico did not bow to his demands to renegotiate the deal. NAFTA talks are still ongoing.

But then, in just the first few months of this year, Trump imposed tariffs on imports of solar energy equipment, washing machines, and steel and aluminum, while also concluding negotiations to amend America’s existing free trade deal with South Korea. In the first significant action aimed directly at China, the Trump administration last week released a list of 1,300 Chinese exports worth $50 billion that could be subject to 25 percent tariffs if Beijing does not change its policies related to intellectual property and forced technology transfer that disadvantage American companies. When China threatened to retaliate with its own tariffs on $50 billion in American exports, mainly agricultural commodities like soybeans and pork, Trump doubled down, raising the possibility of an additional $100 billion in tariffs against China. If implemented, the tit-for-tat could set off a trade war.

The odd thing about these moves, with the notable exception of Trump’s latest China threats, is that they mainly hit close American allies, rather than Beijing. So depending on how things play out, Trump’s trade policies are likely to have more serious and far-reaching implications for Washington’s political relations, rather than for the U.S. economy. Relying on the little-used authority to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum for alleged national security reasons, as the Trump administration did, risks opening a huge loophole for protectionism while increasing trade tensions globally. Exempting allies in Europe—albeit after the fact and only temporarily, while not exempting allies in Asia—raises a host of other troubling geopolitical issues.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article as well as three free articles per month. You'll also receive our free email newsletter to stay up to date on all our coverage:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having your own personal researcher and analyst for news and events around the globe. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of 15,000+ articles
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday
  • Weekly in-depth reports on important issues and countries
  • Daily links to must-read news, analysis, and opinion from top sources around the globe, curated by our keen-eyed team of editors
  • Your choice of weekly region-specific newsletters, delivered to your inbox.
  • Smartphone- and tablet-friendly website.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review