go to top

The African Lions: An Authoritarian Challenge to Development Theory

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

In 1999, Amartya Sen, an Indian economist who a year earlier had won the Nobel Prize for Economics, published "Development as Freedom." Sen mapped out two arguments for a general audience. First, he defined economic development as the expansion of individual freedom, challenging "narrower" views that reduced development to GNP growth or a rise in personal incomes. Sen's ideas spurred the creation of the U.N. Human Development Index, which created a composite measure of development that included income, health and education. Second, Sen maintained that democratic political arrangements, defined as the existence of civil and political freedoms, were necessary to achieve these broadly defined development goals. In his view, open public debates and discussions enabled societies to identify and respond to acute economic needs. As evidence, Sen invoked the history of famines, arguing that "no substantial famine has ever occurred in any independent country with a democratic government and a relatively free press."

Scholars from multiple disciplines -- economics, moral philosophy and political science -- reviewed the book and praised its wide-ranging insights and moral imagination. But only one writer, the philosopher Avishai Margalit, who reviewed the book for the New Republic, identified one of its most important contributions: Sen's defense of democracy as not only intrinsically valuable, but also instrumentally useful for development. For Margalit, Sen's consequentalist argument was "admirably firm" and one of his "most forceful claims." ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.