go to top

Small Arms Trade: Disarmament vs. Regulation

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Just more than a week ago at the United Nations saw the close of the Meeting of Governmental Experts on the Implementation of the Program of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects -- an elaborate name for an initiative whose progress has been marred by bureaucratic chaos, slow implementation and unequal state capacities. The Program of Action, created in 2001, is a series of recommendations on small arms and light weapons, ranging from destruction of surplus arms to changing national laws to regulate the arms trade.

The initiative responds to a recognized problem. In 2000, then-U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan called small arms "the real weapons of mass destruction." But in contrast to the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons, which has spurred a global movement to regulate and control their use and spread, the international trade in small arms and light weapons is unregulated, as well as uneven. While major arms suppliers such as Russia and the United States provide the arms, the major recipients of these weapons are developing nations (.pdf). Small arms and light weapons are also a key enabler of human rights abuses worldwide.   ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.