go to top

The Realist Prism: Prioritizing for the Post-Bin-Laden Era

Friday, May 6, 2011

If the death of Osama bin Laden marks the beginning of the end of the "global war on terrorism," as Michael Cohen argued in a WPR briefing this week, it will have profound consequences for U.S. national security policy. For the last decade, the fight against international terrorism, as personified by bin Laden, was one of the central organizing principles of American foreign and defense policies. Preventing another Sept. 11 was the rationale for the military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as for a whole host of programs in dozens of countries around the world, ranging from security cooperation to improving governance and social services. It was also cited as one of the reasons for seeking improved relations with other major powers including Russia, China and India.

One month after the Sept. 11 attacks, at a forum sponsored by the National Interest and the Nixon Center in Washington, columnist Charles Krauthammer opined that in the decade following the end of the Cold War, the United States used a "holiday from history" to kick pressing global problems "down the road." The fight against al-Qaida, he argued, might be the 21st-century equivalent of the long twilight struggle against the Soviet Union during the second half of the 20th century. Peter Bergen's recently released tome on the war on terror is even explicitly titled, "The Longest War," and posits an "enduring struggle" in the years to come. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.