go to top

The New Rules: Ten Assumptions About Egypt Worth Discarding

Monday, Feb. 14, 2011

There's a lot of trepidation mixed in with the joy of seeing one of the Arab world's great dictators finally step down. With Americans being so down on themselves these days, many see more to fear than to celebrate. But on the whole, there's no good reason for the pessimism on display, which is based on a lot of specious assumptions that need to be discarded. Here's my Top 10 list.

1) Mubarak's quick-exit scenario means this is Iran, 1979. Nonsense, with the key reasons being the deft play by the Egyptian military and its deep and long relationship with the U.S. military, itself a quiet winner here. By stepping in at just the right moment, when the accumulated signals sent by ousted President Hosni Mubarak and his hand-picked vice president, Omar Suleiman, suggested that they felt the old regime still had some legs, the Egyptian army confirmed the people's trust in it as the nation's natural guardian. That is not the Iranian/Revolutionary Guard path, but the Turkish one. So far, the military is giving plenty of signs that it'll meet the people's demands -- in terms of dissolving parliament and revising the constitution -- but on a reasonable schedule, with elections in six months. Most crucially, the military has stated that all of Egypt's previous treaties, including those with Israel, remain in effect. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.