Halutz Resignation Marks Latest Casualty of Lebanon War

Halutz Resignation Marks Latest Casualty of Lebanon War

Last week's resignation of Maj. Gen. Daniel Halutz, the chief of staff of the Israel Defense Force (IDF), could precipitate the long-expected change in Israel's military and political leadership as a result of the country's perceived poor performance during last summer's conflict in Lebanon. There had been numerous calls within Israel for Halutz's departure ever since the military failed to achieve its two major objectives in the war -- securing the release of the two IDF soldiers abducted by Hezbollah guerrillas and destroying that group's military infrastructure in Lebanon.

The massive scale of the fighting that ensued quickly overshadowed the July 12 border kidnapping incident. Despite intense bombing by Israeli warplanes, Hezbollah units managed to launch thousands of rockets into northern Israel, forcing almost a million Israelis to take shelter in local bomb shelters or relocate away from the war zone. The conflict ended one month later when the UN Security Council adopted a ceasefire resolution. Hezbollah remains a major force in Lebanese politics and media reports indicate its military wing has begun replenishing its supply of rockets and other munitions.

The immediate cause of Halutz's departure was the submission of a scathing report to the Knesset Military and Foreign Defense Committee on the General Staff's performance during the Lebanon campaign. Among other failures, the report, written by former IDF Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen Daniel Shomron, faulted Halutz for not ensuring that the IDF implemented his commands. Other critics complain Halutz, the first air force general to become IDF chief of staff, placed too much confidence in the effects of air power. In their view, this misjudgment led the IDF to postpone sending large numbers of Israeli ground troops into the region. Army troops proved necessary to detect and attack Hezbollah fighters, who had blunted the air attacks through clever concealment tactics and by co-locating with sensitive civilian targets (e.g., mosques and apartment buildings).

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review