go to top

Less is Not More in Afghanistan

Friday, March 27, 2009

In his seminal essay the "Twenty-Seven Articles," T.E. Lawrence wrote that "a bad start is difficult to atone for" in an insurgency or counterinsurgency effort. As the Obama administration prepares a new strategy for the war in Afghanistan, it is learning that lesson all too well. For more than seven years, Afghanistan has been the neglected war, impaired by insufficient resources, troops, planning and oversight. Facing a resurgent Taliban, the administration now has no choice but to chart a new path.

Some of the president's strongest supporters are urging him to scale down U.S. ambitions in the country. They contend that the Taliban cannot be defeated, and that the Afghan government will remain feeble no matter how many thousands of American troops and civilian advisers "surge" into Afghanistan. Leslie H. Gelb, writing in the New York Times earlier this month, argued that "finding a way to live with, contain and deter the Taliban is an achievable goal." According to advocates of this "less-is-more" approach, the best plan -- one which would require fewer troops -- is to shift our emphasis towards preventing Afghanistan from becoming a safe haven for al-Qaida. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.