go to top
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa arrives at St. George’s Cathedral in Cape Town, South Africa, Feb. 11, 2018 (AP photo).

Why Is Ramaphosa Making a Risky Bet on Land Reform in South Africa Now?

Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2018

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to put his authority behind not just the cause of land reform in South Africa, but the expropriation of land without compensation, is political risk-taking of the highest order. If it works, he may succeed in building support for the ruling African National Congress ahead of the 2019 general election, as well as neutralizing his populist opponents inside and outside the ANC. But it also has considerable potential for blowback, with Ramaphosa ultimately pleasing no one and alienating important constituencies at home and abroad.

This inevitably raises some broader questions. Why has a president with a well-earned reputation as an operator with renowned political acumen staked so much on an issue where there would appear to be no easy political wins available, indeed quite the opposite—and so close to an election? Is it a sign that he feels insecure and threatened both by rivals within the ANC who want a “radical economic transformation,” and by the opposition Economic Freedom Fighters, and has to match their militancy with some of his own? Whatever the case, Ramaphosa will need all his political skill and finesse to find a route through this political minefield, one which satisfies legitimate demands for change, sends reassuring signals of stability to foreign investors, and allows him to emerge with his credibility intact. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.