go to top
Former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 16, 2016 (AP photo by J. Scott Applewhite).

America’s Political Turmoil Is Threatening the Norms of Civil-Military Relations

Friday, Aug. 24, 2018

In 1992, the U.S. Army War College’s journal Parameters published a provocative article entitled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012,” which critiqued the state of U.S. civil-military relations by imagining a fictional future military takeover of the government. The premise was that political leaders had essentially provoked the military to intervene in the political system by failing to respect their professionalism. The article caused a stir in part because its author, Charles Dunlap, was a serving U.S. Air Force lawyer, but mostly because the idea of a military intervention in the American political system was so inconceivable. Coups happened in other countries, but not in the United States.

It is true that American civil-military relations normally have been cordial. The military unquestioningly accepts the civilian control of the military codified in the Constitution. And—again normally—civilian political leaders respect the military’s apolitical professionalism and go to great lengths to avoid politicizing the armed forces. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.