go to top
A woman holds a sign depicting Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump during a protest outside the White House, Washington, July 17, 2018 (AP photo by Andrew Harnik).

There Is No Strategic Rationale for Trump’s Appeasement of Putin

Friday, July 20, 2018

Everyone other than President Donald Trump’s most ardent loyalists considered his performance at—and after—this week’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin a disaster. Standing beside one of America’s most skilled adversaries, Trump blasted his own domestic political opponents, while again adopting the language of dictators by calling the nonpartisan media “an enemy of the people.” He once again accepted Putin’s denial of Russian meddling in America’s 2016 election despite the U.S. intelligence community’s conviction that it happened. Instead of highlighting the deep policy differences between the United States and Russia, Trump adopted the Russian positions on what caused the deterioration of bilateral relations. And in stark contrast to the way he treated America’s close NATO allies a few days earlier, he lavished praise on Putin.

Criticism was immediate and vociferous. CNN’s John King called the Helsinki meeting Trump’s “surrender summit.” Columnist Max Boot described it as the “sellout in Helsinki.” Sen. John McCain decried the post-summit press conference as “the most disgraceful performance by an American president in memory.” Former CIA Director John Brennan tweeted, “It was nothing short of treasonous.” ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.