go to top
President Donald Trump before delivering a statement from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House withdrawing the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal, Washington, May 8, 2018 (AP photo by Evan Vucci).

The Limits of Being Right, and the Costs of Being Wrong, on the Iran Deal

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

In politics, as in marital disputes, being right is overrated. That lesson was learned the hard way by defenders of the Iran nuclear deal, which President Donald Trump formally pulled the United States out of yesterday.

No one, even among the deal’s most ardent supporters, disputes the claim that the agreement is flawed and imperfect from an American perspective. After all, it required compromises and concessions that were necessary to reach a negotiated, rather than an imposed, final agreement. Whether or not those concessions were too generous is a valid subject of debate. It is possible, though unprovable, that Iran might have been willing to give away more at the bargaining table in return for relief from the crippling sanctions it was facing at the time the deal was made three years ago. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.