go to top
A civilian fighter in the ruins of Benghazi, Libya, Feb. 23, 2016 (AP photo by Mohammed el-Shaiky).

Why Libya Shouldn’t Be Lumped In With Iraq as a U.S. Foreign Policy Failure

Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018

The U.S. foreign policy community tosses the word “failure” around a lot: intelligence failures, policy failures, failures of imagination. Each American president is assigned his share of failures, sometimes based on reflections of those who participated in hard policy decisions, but more often based on judgments made by others who were not directly involved. It’s perfectly fair to assess whether the outcome of a particular policy succeeded or failed to achieve its stated goal. Yet over time, some misleading “truths” become established that need to be checked and revisited.

Take the increasingly common framing of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya as a collective failure of recent administrations. Of course, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are the legacy of President George W. Bush, while it was President Barack Obama who made the call about a U.S. role in the intervention in Libya in 2011. So while Iraq—less so, Afghanistan—is seen as the failed foreign policy of a neoconservative administration, the failure of judgment in Libya is aimed squarely at Obama and his band of liberal interventionists. If anything, Syria should loom larger than Libya as an Obama-era failure, but that’s a subject for another day. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.