go to top
U.S. Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis speaks during a press conference with South Korean Defense Minister Song Young-moo, Seoul, South Korea, Oct. 28, 2017 (Pool photo via AP by Jung Yeon-Je).

A ‘Bloody Nose’ Strike on North Korea Is Certainly Risky. Is It Crazy?

Friday, Feb. 9, 2018

Over the past few months, the Trump administration has reportedly been mulling a limited, preventive military strike against North Korea, what has been called the “bloody nose” strategy. Pushed hardest by President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, it is based on the belief that if North Korea has the ability to strike the United States with nuclear weapons, Washington would be deterred from intervening on the Korean Peninsula, thus allowing Pyongyang to step up its aggression against South Korea and other nearby nations. The only way to prevent this scenario, the thinking goes, is a military strike against North Korea that doesn’t eliminate its missile and nuclear weapons facilities entirely, but signals American intent to keep Pyongyang’s nuclear program in check. The U.S. gives Pyongyang a “bloody nose” without provoking an all-out war.

Understandably, this idea has met vociferous opposition given the risks of escalation and retaliation, especially against America’s ally, South Korea. The editorial board of The New York Times, for instance, accused the Trump administration of “playing with fire and fury.” Mira Rapp-Hooper has argued in The Atlantic that “the Trump administration’s use of preventive force would be a suicidal reaction to uncertainty.” Peter Beinart has slammed “Trump’s reckless pursuit of a military solution to a problem that has none.” And this is only a small sample of the passionate indictments hurled at the “bloody nose” strategy, all stressing its danger. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.