go to top
An anti-war protester wears a mask showing North Korean leader Kim Jong Un during a demonstration against nuclear weapons, Berlin, Germany, Nov. 18, 2017 (AP photo by Michael Sohn).

In the Effort To Reduce Weapons Of Mass Destruction, the Glass Looks Half Empty

Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2017

Progress in reducing the spread and use of weapons of mass destruction is never linear. But these days, there seem to be more steps backward than forward. From the failure to stop North Korea from becoming the world’s ninth nuclear power to the tragically incomplete diplomatic work to rid Syria of chemical weapons, the efforts to advance global norms to reduce the threats from weapons of mass destruction are falling short. Granting the Nobel Peace Prize to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, which advocated for the new nuclear disarmament treaty that 122 countries voted for at the United Nations last summer, seems like a shallow gesture to try to close the gap between aspiration and reality.

Around the world, new developments demonstrate how hard it has become to strengthen the global norms that aim to prevent the spread and use of weapons of mass destruction. From North Korea to Syria, coercive diplomacy and occasional diplomatic negotiations have provided only fleeting moments of reassurance. In both cases, defiance of the international rules has prevailed. Nuclear arsenals across Asia—in China, India and Pakistan—are growing, and U.S. plans to modernize its nuclear triad do not convey any hope that the current nuclear powers will pay much heed to the new treaty to ban nuclear weapons. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
$ 25 for 3 months
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel during trial and pay nothing.
  • Just $25 quarterly after trial.
$ 75 for 1 year
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel during trial and pay nothing.
  • Just $75 annually after trial.