go to top
A woman walks past a TV screen showing U.S. President Donald Trump giving his maiden address at the U.N. General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 20, 2017 (AP photo by Eugene Hoshiko).

The U.S. Must Consider the Cascading Global Effects of an Attack on North Korea

Friday, Oct. 27, 2017

During the past few weeks, the standoff between North Korea and the United States has cooled a bit. Pyongyang has not tested more ballistic missiles or nuclear devices, and U.S. President Donald Trump has not launched more insulting tweets at North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. That is good, but the crisis is no closer to resolution than it was months or years ago; there is not even a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel. It remains the world’s most dangerous threat.

It is hard to see a path to resolution at this point. In a recent interview, Trump’s national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, reiterated that the “only acceptable outcome” for the United States is the denuclearization of North Korea. Nearly every expert on North Korea considers this impossible, since nuclear weapons are the Kim regime’s guarantee of survival and the only thing that draws the attention that Kim seems to crave. Without nuclear weapons, North Korea is simply poor, weak and irrelevant. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
Get unlimited access to must-read news, analysis and opinion from top experts. Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 9,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.

YES, I want to subscribe now.