go to top
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and South Korean Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se at a press conference in Seoul, March 17, 2017 (Pool photo by Jung Yeon-Je via AP).

Why Military Action Against North Korea Is the Worst Option—and Possibly Necessary

Friday, March 17, 2017

The threat from North Korea to the United States, the Asia-Pacific region, and the global economy is growing rapidly. For decades the dynasty of Kim family dictators has used military provocation to fend off external pressure. Over the past decade, this took a particularly ominous turn as Pyongyang added a nuclear capability to its massive conventional military force. Today the erratic aggression of Kim Jong Un, North Korea’s current dictator, is pushing the danger to ever greater heights, backed by a growing nuclear arsenal and ballistic missile capability.

When North Korea first tested an atomic device in 2006, the United States was not terribly concerned. The George W. Bush administration saw this as a cry for attention from a regime that at the time had no nuclear warheads or reliable systems to deliver them. Much has changed since then. Pyongyang may have as many as 20 nuclear warheads and the capability to make more. Its delivery systems are improving. Last year, North Korea tested its first two-stage, solid-fuel ballistic missile. And it seems determined to build intercontinental ballistic missiles that can strike the United States. ...

Want to Read the Rest?
Login or Subscribe Today.
$ 25 for 3 months
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel during trial and pay nothing.
  • Just $25 quarterly after trial.
$ 75 for 1 year
  • Two-week FREE trial access.
  • Cancel during trial and pay nothing.
  • Just $75 annually after trial.