Populism’s Rise and the Fate of the Global Middle Class

Populism’s Rise and the Fate of the Global Middle Class
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump campaigning at a recycling facility, Monessen, Pa., June 28, 2016 (AP photo by Keith Srakocic).

Editor’s note: This article is part of an ongoing WPR series inviting authors to identify the biggest priority—whether a threat, risk, opportunity or challenge—facing the international order and U.S. foreign policy today.

For the past decade, globalization and anti-globalization perplexingly fell out of favor in the analytical narratives of most commentators on international affairs. The winners and losers of globalization, which defined the major debates about economic policies during the 1990s and early 2000s, simply ceased to be discussed. Perhaps it was because this particular framing was closely tied to debates about the World Trade Organization, protests against it, and free trade as facilitated by multinational corporations, all of which became less pressing features of the global economy when faced with the systemic crisis of finance and banking that began in 2007 and 2008. The lack of discussion about globalization also coincided with a period in which the WTO looked to be increasingly outdated and incapable of reaching further international agreements on liberalized trade.

So it came as a surprise when anti-trade rhetoric, and a corresponding discussion of globalization’s winners and losers, reappeared with the current populist backlash in some Western countries. This was particularly true in the United Kingdom, which shocked the world by voting in favor of leaving the European Union in the Brexit referendum in June, and in the United States, where anti-trade bias is the driving idea in Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s economic platform. His critique of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and his rival Hillary Clinton’s prior support of it are, according to Trump, aimed squarely at protecting globalization’s losers from more trade liberalization, with a vague promise to bring back jobs and capital from overseas.

Keep reading for free!

Get instant access to the rest of this article by submitting your email address below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:

Or, Subscribe now to get full access.

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

What you’ll get with an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review:

A WPR subscription is like no other resource — it’s like having a personal curator and expert analyst of global affairs news. Subscribe now, and you’ll get:

  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • Regular in-depth articles with deep dives into important issues and countries.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.
  • The Weekly Review email, with quick summaries of the week’s most important coverage, and what’s to come.
  • Completely ad-free reading.

And all of this is available to you when you subscribe today.

More World Politics Review