go to top
Pakistani protesters rally against recent U.S. drone attack in Pakistani territory, Lahore, Pakistan, June 10, 2016 (AP photo by K.M. Chaudary).

Drone Casualty Data Highlights the Limits, and Downsides, of Transparency

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

The Obama administration recently released government information about civilian casualties from U.S. drone strikes targeting terrorists and violent extremists. The data was long-promised and long-awaited, but its release nevertheless received a tepid response from advocates for greater transparency. While the administration deserves some credit for finally acting on its own pledge, it’s clear that total transparency on this and other security issues is not an easy bar to clear. What’s more, it may not resolve disputes over policy and in some cases is not even desirable.

Upon taking office, U.S. President Barack Obama set as an early goal “an unprecedented level of openness in government,” and listed three commitments to that end: transparency, participation and collaboration. Transparency, according to the White House website, promotes accountability and informs citizens. The administration pledged to “disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use.” ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.