go to top

Diplomatic Fallout: Did Susan Rice Save the U.N. From Irrelevance?

Monday, June 10, 2013

How will Susan Rice be remembered at the United Nations? Since President Barack Obama announced his decision to appoint Rice as his national security adviser last week, analyses of her service at the U.N. since 2009 have swung from the gossipy to the philosophical. The gossips have recycled stories of Rice’s robust sparring with her counterparts, which at times involved fiery language. The philosophers have reflected on the ambassador’s role in advancing the cause of humanitarian intervention in Libya, as well as in later debates over nonintervention in Syria.

But many commentators have missed one basic point: Rice kept the job of U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations from becoming irrelevant. By 2009, the post risked marginalization due to factors ranging from the George W. Bush administration’s ill-treatment of the U.N. to the rise of the G-20 as an alternative forum for the big powers. Rice reasserted the centrality of the U.N. to American policy on issues from Iran to the Koreas. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.