go to top

Strategic Horizons: Benghazi and the Myth of the Invincible U.S. Military

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Last week's congressional hearing on the September 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, reignited the controversy over allegations that the Obama administration covered up or lied about details of the attack. The dispute will consume Washington for some time, ultimately influencing President Barack Obama’s effectiveness during his second term as well as the way the U.S. military responds to future crises.

There are three big questions about the Benghazi attacks: Did the Obama administration, particularly the State Department, take prudent steps to assure the security of embassy personnel in Libya before the attacks? Has the administration been open and honest about its actions and decisions before, during and after the attacks? And did the U.S. military make every reasonable effort to respond while the attacks were underway? The first two questions will be fought out in the political arena, but the third has direct implications for the Defense Department and the uniformed military. ...

To read more,

enter your email address then choose one of the three options below.

Subscribe to World Politics Review and you'll receive instant access to 10,000+ articles in the World Politics Review Library, along with new comprehensive analysis every weekday . . . written by leading topic experts.